NZ Election 2026 · The Parties, the Issues and the Long Game

The parties · 7 of 7, by current seats

Opportunity

At a glance

Poll average (%)
6.2
Readiness to 2050 /100
55 fair
Voter priorities /100
58 fair
Confidence it happens
Low
Fiscal detail
Tax package

Current settings score 58 on Readiness to 2050 and 55 on Voter priorities. Confidence is shown beside the scores, never added to them.

Grouping scores

Select a grouping for the rationale and sources behind each score.

Who

A "blue-green" party founded in 2016, in its fourth election. Wong is a former B Corp movement lead and climate transition adviser.

The pitch

Three-year flip-flops waste money. Fix politics with ten-year cross-party plans and independent institutions, and rebuild the tax system around land rather than work.

Coalition stance and bottom lines

Will work with "either Labour or National" and talks first to the party with most seats. Five bottom lines: lower prices, clean politics, a health plan, ocean health, climate credibility. The land tax is not one.

Five headline policies

  1. Swaps taxes on work for a 1.75% land tax
  2. Pays almost every adult a Citizen's Income of up to $370 a week ($19,400 a year), replacing NZ Super with a top-up to current Super rates
  3. Borrows up to $60b for infrastructure over ten years through a new Infrastructure Fund, keeping interest under 1% of GDP
  4. Lifts health funding to 9% of GDP over ten years (costed by the party at about $1.3b a year)
  5. Caps political donations at $30,000 per donor

Who gains / Who pays

Who gainsWho pays
Earners from $20,000 to $120,000Owners of high-value land
Renters and first-home buyersSome homeowners
People facing steep benefit clawbacksFuture taxpayers, through borrowing

On the long game

  • Builds: productivity, climate, infrastructure
  • Borrows: ageing
  • Global risks with a concrete plan: 2 of 5 (Climate change and ecological breakdown; Erosion of trust and governance)
  • Governing for the long term: Four-year term: Silent · With other parties: Plans · Institutions: Plans · Inheritance: Plans
Four pressures to 2050
PressureEffectWould it last?
Ageing and the fiscal gapBorrowsUnlikely
Productivity and incomesBuildsUnlikely
Climate and resilienceBuildsLikely
The infrastructure deficitBuildsPartly
Five global risks
RiskAt homeWith others
Advanced AI going badlyAcknowledgesSilent
Climate change and ecological breakdownAcknowledgesPlans
Engineered pandemicsAcknowledgesSilent
Great-power conflict, including nuclear warSilentSilent
Erosion of trust and governancePlansSilent

Governing for the long term

Opportunity: governing for the long term

Rating on each count, Rated, never added to the scores. Rests on a stated value: long-term plans should survive a change of government.

CommittedPlansAcknowledgesSilentWeakens

Rated, never added to the scores. Rests on a stated value: long-term plans should survive a change of government. Opportunity: Four-year term Silent, Plans with other parties Plans, Long-term institutions Plans, Honours what it inherits Plans.

Opportunity
Ratings from party documents and votes to the evidence cut-off; every rating, note and source is in continuity-ratings.csv on the sources page.
Sources for these ratings

Watch for

Its own infrastructure interest estimate turns a $1.9b surplus into a $0.6b to $1.6b shortfall. If land values fall 21%, the land tax could raise about $5b less. Reviewers are unnamed. It would give the Commerce Commission power to force structural separation. On Te Tiriti: repeal the 2025 customary marine title law; Māori as full partners in marine protection.

Since 19 October (not yet scored)

  • Wong says she will call Luxon first and, "if he really wants to be in opposition", speak to Labour next.

Party order is by seats in the current Parliament. 7 parties, the same template each.